RightWingPolling logo
▼ Law and Justice polls 21.0% (-15.8 pts) in Poland▼ People Power Party polls 31.9% (-12.7 pts) in South Korea▲ La Libertad Avanza polls 33.8% (+10.5 pts) in Argentina▼ Alliance for the Union of Romanians polls 22.4% (-10.4 pts) in Romania▲ Republican Party of Chile polls 20.1% (+8.1 pts) in Chile▼ Nuevas Ideas polls 51.3% (-7.4 pts) in El Salvador▲ Fidesz polls 34.0% (+7.0 pts) in Hungary▲ Popular Force polls 14.1% (+6.9 pts) in Peru▲ Chega polls 29.0% (+6.6 pts) in Portugal▲ BJP polls 45.1% (+6.2 pts) in India▲ Progress Party polls 31.0% (+5.3 pts) in Norway▲ Victory Party polls 4.7% (+5.2 pts) in Turkey▲ Conservative Party of Canada polls 29.4% (+5.0 pts) in Canada▼ Likud polls 22.6% (-4.8 pts) in Israel▼ Liberal–National Coalition polls 20.7% (-4.5 pts) in Australia▲ Vlaams Belang polls 26.6% (+4.0 pts) in Belgium▼ Democratic Centre polls 6.9% (-3.7 pts) in Colombia▼ Slovenian Democratic Party polls 28.6% (-3.4 pts) in Slovenia▼ National Rally polls 34.7% (-3.0 pts) in France▲ Conservative People’s Party of Estonia polls 12.8% (+2.4 pts) in Estonia▲ ELAM polls 13.6% (+2.4 pts) in Cyprus▼ Reform UK polls 22.6% (-2.0 pts) in United Kingdom▲ AfD polls 28.5% (+2.0 pts) in Germany▼ Denmark Democrats polls 5.4% (-1.8 pts) in Denmark▼ Greek Solution polls 7.2% (-1.8 pts) in Greece▼ National Action Party polls 14.7% (-1.6 pts) in Mexico▲ Finns Party polls 15.6% (+1.5 pts) in Finland▲ Republika polls 12.9% (+1.4 pts) in Slovakia▼ Republican Party polls 45.0% (-1.2 pts) in USA▼ National Alliance polls 8.8% (-1.2 pts) in Latvia▲ Liberal Party polls 41.5% (+1.1 pts) in Brazil▼ PVV polls 18.0% (-1.0 pts) in Netherlands▲ Sweden Democrats polls 18.9% (+1.0 pts) in Sweden▲ Serbian Progressive Party polls 42.1% (+1.0 pts) in Serbia▼ Homeland Movement polls 2.2% (-1.0 pts) in Croatia▲ Independent Ireland polls 5.6% (+1.0 pts) in Ireland▼ Revival polls 5.2% (-0.9 pts) in Bulgaria▲ ACT New Zealand polls 9.6% (+0.8 pts) in New Zealand▲ Liberal Democratic Party polls 33.8% (+0.6 pts) in Japan▲ Vox polls 18.8% (+0.6 pts) in Spain▲ Brothers of Italy polls 27.0% (+0.4 pts) in Italy▲ Freedom Front Plus polls 3.4% (+0.4 pts) in South Africa▲ Dawn of Nemunas polls 12.7% (+0.3 pts) in Lithuania▲ Swiss People's Party polls 28.2% (+0.2 pts) in Switzerland▲ FPÖ polls 28.8% (+0.1 pts) in Austria▼ ANO 2011 polls 34.5% (-0.1 pts) in Czechia▲ Gerindra Party polls 23.7% (0.0 pts) in Indonesia▲ Hugpong ng Pagbabago polls 39.2% (0.0 pts) in Philippines▲ United Russia polls 34.5% (0.0 pts) in Russia▲ Bhumjaithai Party polls 18.6% (0.0 pts) in Thailand▲ Kuomintang polls 21.5% (0.0 pts) in Taiwan▲ Perikatan Nasional polls 29.0% (0.0 pts) in Malaysia▲ Christian Social People's Party polls 28.5% (0.0 pts) in Luxembourg▲ Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf polls 35.0% (0.0 pts) in Pakistan▲ People's Action Party polls 65.6% (0.0 pts) in Singapore▲ Independence Party polls 19.4% (0.0 pts) in Iceland

About

About Us

An independent electoral-research terminal documenting the global conservative realignment.

RightWingPolling is an independent, non-partisan research initiative. We systematically collect publicly reported national voting-intention surveys and present them in a single comparable framework — verified poll average, quarterly momentum change and trend history — covering forty-six electorally significant conservative, Christian-democratic and national-conservative parties worldwide, from governing forces such as Fidesz in Hungary and the BJP in India to opposition challengers such as the AfD in Germany and Reform UK in Britain.

Our research question

Across Europe, North America, Latin America and South Asia, conservative and right-of-centre parties have recorded sustained electoral gains over the past decade — a pattern sociologists and political scientists describe as a global conservative realignment. We treat this as an empirical phenomenon to be measured, not a position to be advocated. Using trend analysis, volatility measurement and momentum-cycle mapping, we document where support is consolidating or eroding, how stable each trend proves across consecutive verified releases, and how durable each movement is across survey waves.

Why a verified average

National polls are published in different languages, on different schedules and with different methodologies — and any single survey can mislead through house effects or sampling noise. Our terminal therefore averages the last verified readings per party (at most five). Lone outliers are diluted, and what remains is a steadier signal: quarterly comparisons and verified-history charts let researchers, journalists and citizens compare trajectory dynamics across democracies at a glance. Full detail is available on our Methodology page.

What we do — and don't do

We aggregate, normalise and visualise published polls; we do not conduct surveys ourselves, we do not forecast elections, we do not campaign for or against any party, and we never let a single pollster dictate the headline. Each party page names the verified pollster behind its figure — with figure, movement and fieldwork date — so readers can verify the number independently, and contextualises the trajectory in analytical language. Inclusion is determined solely by electoral significance — vote share, parliamentary representation and coalition relevance — never by ideological sympathy.

Independence and neutrality

We are not affiliated with any political party, campaign, government or polling firm, and we accept no partisan funding. Coverage of a party on this terminal constitutes statistical observation, not endorsement of its platform; parties across the centre-right to national-conservative spectrum are analysed with identical metrics and identical scrutiny. Party names and marks shown for identification belong to their respective owners. Corrections are published promptly whenever an error is verified — see our Contact page for how to report one.

Analytical standards

Every figure on this site traces back to publicly reported surveys from recognised national pollsters. We name the verified pollster behind each figure and date every update. Where pollsters revise their figures, we follow the revision and the average updates accordingly. Where sampling volatility, house effects, herding or turnout-model differences limit what even an average can show, we state the limitation explicitly rather than concealing it.

For questions, corrections or source suggestions, please visit our Contact page. For how your data is handled, see our Privacy Policy.